Someone needs to read the rule book again because that is not a kicking motion at all. The puck directed off of Coleman's skate while he was tangled up with Cody Ceci and attempting to stop. The only reason his skate lifts off the ice is because, and common sense here, he was dragged to the ice by Ceci. Not only do officials and those in the "war room" have trouble with goaltender interference calls, but clearly can't tell what a kicking motion is either.
This will undoubtedly go down as one of the most controversial calls in playoff history. This is a complete opposite play from 2004 when the puck appeared to cross the line during Game 6 of the Cup Final between Tampa and Calgary but no official review was initiated. Here, the officials reviewed it without a coaches challenge and somehow deemed it a kicking motion without taking into account the other factors such as Coleman trying to stop while being dragged to the ice.
Unfortunately for the Flames, the game remained 4-4 through regulation time and went to OT, where Connor McDavid punched the Oilers' ticket to the Western Conference Finals. This one is going to be talked about for quite some time.
POLL | ||
27 MAI | 329 ANSWERS Controversy in Calgary as the Flames have game-winning goal called back due to ''kicking motion'' Should Blake Coleman's third period goal have counted? | ||
Absolutely | 209 | 63.5 % |
No | 53 | 16.1 % |
I'm out of words for how bad the officials are | 67 | 20.4 % |
List of polls |