Post-game comments saw Sheldon Keefe calling out Stamkos' actions against Matthews as a way to manipulate the officials. Stamkos has since responded with his side of the story.
Stamkos makes a decent point about how he'd expect a similar response from the Leafs if the roles had been reversed and the likes of Matthews or Mitch Marner went headfirst into the boards instead. However, if you watch the entire sequence below, you'll see just how long it took for Stamkos to go after Matthews following what happened with Point and the incoming penalty against Kucherov.
I think the fight was unwarranted. Matthews wasn't even part of anything going on, and Stamkos could've easily sent a message by doing something other than starting an unnecessary fight with a guy who clearly wasn't engaging in the tension.
POLL | ||
23 AVRIL | 2853 ANSWERS Stamkos explains his decision to attack Auston Matthews in Game 3 Do you think this type of response from Stamkos was warranted? | ||
Yes, he's sticking up for his teammate | 208 | 7.3 % |
No, the fight wasn't necessary | 2295 | 80.4 % |
Playoffs just be like that sometimes | 350 | 12.3 % |
List of polls |